vault backup: 2025-02-20 15:08:09
This commit is contained in:
parent
d62b2f8867
commit
680fb334ac
17
.obsidian/workspace.json
vendored
17
.obsidian/workspace.json
vendored
@ -20,21 +20,8 @@
|
|||||||
"icon": "lucide-file",
|
"icon": "lucide-file",
|
||||||
"title": "Initial Questions"
|
"title": "Initial Questions"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
"id": "846cc9fc78006404",
|
|
||||||
"type": "leaf",
|
|
||||||
"state": {
|
|
||||||
"type": "release-notes",
|
|
||||||
"state": {
|
|
||||||
"currentVersion": "1.8.7"
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
"icon": "lucide-book-up",
|
|
||||||
"title": "Release Notes 1.8.7"
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
]
|
||||||
],
|
|
||||||
"currentTab": 1
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
],
|
],
|
||||||
"direction": "vertical"
|
"direction": "vertical"
|
||||||
@ -212,7 +199,7 @@
|
|||||||
"omnisearch:Omnisearch": false
|
"omnisearch:Omnisearch": false
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
"active": "846cc9fc78006404",
|
"active": "fcc28e70ad8acbd2",
|
||||||
"lastOpenFiles": [
|
"lastOpenFiles": [
|
||||||
"Software Engineering/TA Meeting 1.md",
|
"Software Engineering/TA Meeting 1.md",
|
||||||
"Extracurricular/Misc/Plan.md",
|
"Extracurricular/Misc/Plan.md",
|
||||||
|
@ -7,12 +7,17 @@
|
|||||||
- What is the expected level of background in Coq or formal methods?
|
- What is the expected level of background in Coq or formal methods?
|
||||||
- Can you explain the process by which a smart contract's safety properties will be validated formally?
|
- Can you explain the process by which a smart contract's safety properties will be validated formally?
|
||||||
- Are there any existing case studies or example proofs we might refer to for a better understanding of the expected output?
|
- Are there any existing case studies or example proofs we might refer to for a better understanding of the expected output?
|
||||||
- How much of the formal verification process will be based on axioms versus fully constructive proofs?
|
|
||||||
- Define the contract verification criteria
|
- Define the contract verification criteria
|
||||||
### Project scope clarifications
|
### Project scope clarifications
|
||||||
- Among the seven smart contracts being verified, which ones do you expect us to work on, and why those?
|
- Among the seven smart contracts being verified, which ones do you expect us to work on, and why those?
|
||||||
- Which technologies are we going to be introduced to, if any? Will we have access to guides for Coq and Solidity?
|
- Which technologies are we going to be introduced to, if any? Will we have access to guides for Coq and Solidity?
|
||||||
- How do you envision the high-level Coq framework integrating with existing Solidity projects?
|
- How do you envision the high-level Coq framework integrating with existing Solidity projects?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Optional
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- How much of the formal verification process will be based on axioms versus fully constructive proofs?
|
||||||
- Could you elaborate on the notion of “high-level primitives” (e.g., identity, item, property) and how flexible they need to be for different types of contracts?
|
- Could you elaborate on the notion of “high-level primitives” (e.g., identity, item, property) and how flexible they need to be for different types of contracts?
|
||||||
- "real numbers and integer approximations"?
|
- "real numbers and integer approximations"?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user