From 0b7d34a3e1687193a44a2ab7c9ca61ee710efee9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boyan Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 20:09:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] CENTER THE FUCKING IMAGE --- README.md | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index ea61c19..f872e6d 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,22 +1,21 @@ # Omniyagi -Disclaimer: This is just an opinion. - +Disclaimer: This is just an opinion. ## Introduction The usual omnidirectional antenna has a radiation pattern of: - + The usual yagi antenna has a radiation pattern as shown in: - + For the sake of brevity, let these simplifications of said radiation patterns be true(within the thought experiment). - - + + ## Problem @@ -35,11 +34,11 @@ We know the distances between each of the points. Both strategies involve direction finding of some sort. [Direction finding](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direction_finding) using vector intersection is quite self explanatory, you take the antenna in which the signal is the strongest, take the two nearest antennas and find the point in which the vectors overlap. The point left at the end is our location. - + When it comes to circles, however, the strategy is different. [Trilateration](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilateration) is a way of pinpointing a location using ranges. The approach is different from the usual, as we do not have multiple antennas, but rather a single moving one. Trilateration goes like: Get readings from 3 different points(it would help if they were polar opposites). Find the intersection of the three circles that you have. That's the point we're looking for. - + ### Expected results YS is not as effective, however it is way more efficient than OMS on many levels. At least on paper. A list of all the theoretical pros of YS over OMS: