CENTER THE FUCKING IMAGE
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ed8e45578
commit
6c4198a30b
26
README.md
26
README.md
@ -1,31 +1,22 @@
|
|||||||
<style>
|
|
||||||
img {
|
|
||||||
display:flex;
|
|
||||||
justify-content:center;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
.divvy {
|
|
||||||
width:100%;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
</style>
|
|
||||||
<div class="divvy">
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Omniyagi
|
# Omniyagi
|
||||||
<sub>Disclaimer: This is just an opinion.</sub>
|
<sub>Disclaimer: This is just an opinion.</sub>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Introduction
|
## Introduction
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The usual omnidirectional antenna has a radiation pattern of:
|
The usual omnidirectional antenna has a radiation pattern of:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e1/L-over2-rad-pat-per.jpg"/>
|
<img style="display:flex; justify-content:center" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e1/L-over2-rad-pat-per.jpg"/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The usual yagi antenna has a radiation pattern as shown in:
|
The usual yagi antenna has a radiation pattern as shown in:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<img src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.raymaps.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2FYagi-Antenna-3D-Radiation-Pattern.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=fe9716b06b1dcb895fc304ee63e020191fc69416890aca1aecc2fe073115926c&ipo=images"/>
|
<img style="display:flex; justify-content:center" src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.raymaps.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2FYagi-Antenna-3D-Radiation-Pattern.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=fe9716b06b1dcb895fc304ee63e020191fc69416890aca1aecc2fe073115926c&ipo=images"/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For the sake of brevity, let these simplifications of said radiation patterns be true(within the thought experiment).
|
For the sake of brevity, let these simplifications of said radiation patterns be true(within the thought experiment).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<img src="images/omni.png"/>
|
<img style="display:flex; justify-content:center" src="images/omni.png"/>
|
||||||
<img src="images/yagi.png"/>
|
<img style="display:flex; justify-content:center" src="images/yagi.png"/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Problem
|
## Problem
|
||||||
@ -44,11 +35,11 @@ We know the distances between each of the points.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Both strategies involve direction finding of some sort. [Direction finding](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direction_finding) using vector intersection is quite self explanatory, you take the antenna in which the signal is the strongest, take the two nearest antennas and find the point in which the vectors overlap. The point left at the end is our location.
|
Both strategies involve direction finding of some sort. [Direction finding](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direction_finding) using vector intersection is quite self explanatory, you take the antenna in which the signal is the strongest, take the two nearest antennas and find the point in which the vectors overlap. The point left at the end is our location.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Triangulation.svg/800px-Triangulation.svg.png"/>
|
<img style="display:flex; justify-content:center" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Triangulation.svg/800px-Triangulation.svg.png"/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When it comes to circles, however, the strategy is different. [Trilateration](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilateration) is a way of pinpointing a location using ranges. The approach is different from the usual, as we do not have multiple antennas, but rather a single moving one. Trilateration goes like: Get readings from 3 different points(it would help if they were polar opposites). Find the intersection of the three circles that you have. That's the point we're looking for.
|
When it comes to circles, however, the strategy is different. [Trilateration](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilateration) is a way of pinpointing a location using ranges. The approach is different from the usual, as we do not have multiple antennas, but rather a single moving one. Trilateration goes like: Get readings from 3 different points(it would help if they were polar opposites). Find the intersection of the three circles that you have. That's the point we're looking for.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<img src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Constantinos-Patsakis/publication/277077361/figure/fig1/AS:613444243968081@1523267913923/Trilateration-attack-with-exact-distances.png"/>
|
<img style="display:flex; justify-content:center" src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Constantinos-Patsakis/publication/277077361/figure/fig1/AS:613444243968081@1523267913923/Trilateration-attack-with-exact-distances.png"/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Expected results
|
### Expected results
|
||||||
YS is not as effective, however it is way more efficient than OMS on many levels. At least on paper. A list of all the theoretical pros of YS over OMS:
|
YS is not as effective, however it is way more efficient than OMS on many levels. At least on paper. A list of all the theoretical pros of YS over OMS:
|
||||||
@ -81,4 +72,3 @@ That is not to say that OMS does not have pros:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Graphs made with GeoGebra
|
Graphs made with GeoGebra
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
</div>
|
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user