fixed acronym consistency mistake

This commit is contained in:
Boyan 2022-12-02 22:11:45 +01:00
parent 2aec32914f
commit 84295bbfc4

View File

@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ When it comes to circles, however, the strategy is different. [Trilateration](ht
<img style="margin-left:50%" width="50%" src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Constantinos-Patsakis/publication/277077361/figure/fig1/AS:613444243968081@1523267913923/Trilateration-attack-with-exact-distances.png"/> <img style="margin-left:50%" width="50%" src="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Constantinos-Patsakis/publication/277077361/figure/fig1/AS:613444243968081@1523267913923/Trilateration-attack-with-exact-distances.png"/>
### Expected results ### Expected results
YS is not as effective, however it is way more efficient than OMS on many levels. At least on paper. A list of all the theoretical pros of YS over OMS: YS is not as effective, however it is way more efficient than ODS on many levels. At least on paper. A list of all the theoretical pros of YS over ODS:
``` ```
1. Is not affected by temporary intermissions(like static and weather conditions) as much, given that all of the readings are taken simultaneously. 1. Is not affected by temporary intermissions(like static and weather conditions) as much, given that all of the readings are taken simultaneously.
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ YS is not as effective, however it is way more efficient than OMS on many levels
3. Result is certain, given that the point is within the rectangular formation. 3. Result is certain, given that the point is within the rectangular formation.
4. The math is way easier. 4. The math is way easier.
``` ```
That is not to say that OMS does not have pros: That is not to say that ODS does not have pros:
``` ```
1. Less investment when it comes to money/time in the scope of the setup(as you *could* build Yagi antennas yourself). 1. Less investment when it comes to money/time in the scope of the setup(as you *could* build Yagi antennas yourself).