done with small-scale simulations and no algorithm for omni
This commit is contained in:
parent
a61e64bfee
commit
34f606cc1d
@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ That is not to say that OMS does not have pros:
|
||||
Disclaimer: These simulation are **seriously** half-assed.
|
||||
|
||||
##### Yagi simulation
|
||||

|
||||
This is the simulation of the aforementioned strategy. We can take from it that, if the location we are looking for is inside of the area of the rectangle formed by connecting the antenna points, or even slightly outside - we will find it. I would say in a rather rapid manner(depending on the speed of spinning).
|
||||
<img style="margin-left:50%" width="50%" src="images/yagi.gif"/>
|
||||
This is the simulation of one of the aforementioned strategy. We can take from it that, if the location we are looking for is inside of the area of the rectangle formed by connecting the antenna points, or even slightly outside - we will find it. I would say in a rather rapid manner(depending on the speed of spinning).
|
||||
|
||||
##### Omnidirectional simulation
|
||||

|
||||
<img style="margin-left:50%" width="50%" src="images/omni.gif"/>
|
||||
Would you look at that. Fueled by pure pseudorandomness, this "algorithm" if you will is blowing the competition away. Imagine if there was a real algorithm that got closer and closer! As you can see, it takes a lot less time to cover the entirety of the rectangular area we have. But what about, scaling things up a bit...(CLIFFHANGER WOOOOOOOOOOO((i'm gonna finish this later))).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user